Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are effective treatments to reduce myelofibrosis symptoms, such as an enlarged spleen size, but they have little impact on the disease itself. New, innovative treatments are needed to elicit deep responses.
Dr. Naveen Pemmaraju (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas) discusses one of these novel treatments: Navitoclax (NAV, AbbVie), which is being tested for myelofibrosis patients in a Phase III (3) trial in combination with a JAKi, ruxolitinib (Jakavi, Novartis). In this specific abstract, ruxolitinib is referred to as RUX.
This interview was obtained at the 2024 European Hematology Association Conference.
The study, called TRANSFORM-1, involved adults with a specific type of blood cancer called myelofibrosis (MF).
These participants were considered to be at intermediate-2 or high risk according to a scoring system called DIPSS+. They also had enlarged spleens and were generally in good physical condition (able to perform daily activities).
The participants were divided into two groups:
The starting dose of NAV depended on the participant's platelet count (a type of blood cell):
The primary goal of this study was to determine the number of participants who had a 35% or greater reduction in spleen size after 6 months of treatment.
Secondary goals included:
Researchers also looked at genetic mutations in the participants and changes in these mutations over time.
The TRANSFORM-1 study showed that the combination of NAV and RUX was more effective than the combination of a placebo and RUX in reducing spleen size and improving some symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis. However, both treatments had a similar impact on fatigue and physical functioning.
63% of participants in the NAV+RUX group had a 35% reduction in spleen size by week 24 compared to 32% in the placebo+RUX group. This result was statistically significant, meaning it was unlikely to be due to chance.
Compared to the placebo+RUX group, more participants in the NAV+RUX group had positive changes in their symptoms and anemia response.
Low platelet and red blood cell counts, diarrhea, and low white blood cell counts were common side effects in the NAV+RUX group. Serious side effects occurred in 28% of the NAV+RUX group and 38% of the placebo+RUX group.
The TRANSFORM-1 study highlights the statistically significant benefits of combining NAV with RUX in treating people with myelofibrosis who have never been treated with JAK inhibitors.
This combination therapy led to a two-fold improvement in spleen volume reduction by week 24 compared to the placebo and RUX combination, even in patients with poor prognostic factors.
The superiority of NAV+RUX was consistent across various subgroups throughout the study.
Patient-reported outcomes showed that both treatment groups had similar symptoms and improvements in physical functioning. However, the NAV+RUX group experienced fewer serious side effects, and no new safety issues were found.
These findings underscore the potential of the NAV+RUX combination as a strong treatment option for myelofibrosis, particularly for those yet to receive JAKis in their treatment.
If you’re interested in participating in a clinical trial, find one that’s right for you today:
Sources:
Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are effective treatments to reduce myelofibrosis symptoms, such as an enlarged spleen size, but they have little impact on the disease itself. New, innovative treatments are needed to elicit deep responses.
Dr. Naveen Pemmaraju (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas) discusses one of these novel treatments: Navitoclax (NAV, AbbVie), which is being tested for myelofibrosis patients in a Phase III (3) trial in combination with a JAKi, ruxolitinib (Jakavi, Novartis). In this specific abstract, ruxolitinib is referred to as RUX.
This interview was obtained at the 2024 European Hematology Association Conference.
The study, called TRANSFORM-1, involved adults with a specific type of blood cancer called myelofibrosis (MF).
These participants were considered to be at intermediate-2 or high risk according to a scoring system called DIPSS+. They also had enlarged spleens and were generally in good physical condition (able to perform daily activities).
The participants were divided into two groups:
The starting dose of NAV depended on the participant's platelet count (a type of blood cell):
The primary goal of this study was to determine the number of participants who had a 35% or greater reduction in spleen size after 6 months of treatment.
Secondary goals included:
Researchers also looked at genetic mutations in the participants and changes in these mutations over time.
The TRANSFORM-1 study showed that the combination of NAV and RUX was more effective than the combination of a placebo and RUX in reducing spleen size and improving some symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis. However, both treatments had a similar impact on fatigue and physical functioning.
63% of participants in the NAV+RUX group had a 35% reduction in spleen size by week 24 compared to 32% in the placebo+RUX group. This result was statistically significant, meaning it was unlikely to be due to chance.
Compared to the placebo+RUX group, more participants in the NAV+RUX group had positive changes in their symptoms and anemia response.
Low platelet and red blood cell counts, diarrhea, and low white blood cell counts were common side effects in the NAV+RUX group. Serious side effects occurred in 28% of the NAV+RUX group and 38% of the placebo+RUX group.
The TRANSFORM-1 study highlights the statistically significant benefits of combining NAV with RUX in treating people with myelofibrosis who have never been treated with JAK inhibitors.
This combination therapy led to a two-fold improvement in spleen volume reduction by week 24 compared to the placebo and RUX combination, even in patients with poor prognostic factors.
The superiority of NAV+RUX was consistent across various subgroups throughout the study.
Patient-reported outcomes showed that both treatment groups had similar symptoms and improvements in physical functioning. However, the NAV+RUX group experienced fewer serious side effects, and no new safety issues were found.
These findings underscore the potential of the NAV+RUX combination as a strong treatment option for myelofibrosis, particularly for those yet to receive JAKis in their treatment.
If you’re interested in participating in a clinical trial, find one that’s right for you today:
Sources:
about the author
Audrey Burton-Bethke
Audrey is a content writer and editor for the HealthTree Foundation. She originally joined the HealthTree Foundation in 2020. Audrey loves spending time with her supportive husband, energetic four-year-old, and new baby.
Subscribe to the weekly newsletter for news, stories, clinical trial updates, and helpful resources and events with cancer experts.