The ADMIRAL trial showed an improvement
in the median survival of patients
treated with gilteritinib from about 5 to 6 months
to nine months.
Now,
very few
patients were still receiving gilteritinib
after two years, and that shouldn't be unexpected
since FLT3 mutations
especially the IDT
mutation, is a late event in leukemogenesis.
So I think it would be unlikely
that a single agent such as gilteritinib
would be effective as a more prolonged
maintenance therapy in patients.
I think
it's highly unlikely that any FLT3 inhibitor
as a single agent would be curative for acute
myeloid leukemia, as we know.
This is a very heterogeneous disease.
The median number of mutations in patients is four
and FLT3 mutations, especially the ITD are late
events in leukemogenesis.
So by just targeting FLT3 with an inhibitor,
I think it's highly unlikely
that we'll get prolonged remissions
with single agent therapy.
And so we really do need to stress
and focus on combinations with chemotherapies
either intensive, such as 7+3 and high dose
cytarabine or less intensive therapies
in order to see a benefit of FLT3 inhibition
or in the future immunotherapies
as well in combination with FLT3 inhibitors
such as gilteritinib
Resistance can occur
with any FLT3 inhibitor that we use in the clinic.
In terms of gilteritinib,
we do see resistance develop
now, since gilteritinib is a type one inhibitor
and it inhibits both the FLT3 ITD
and the TKD mutation, when patients progress
on gilteritinib, they typically do not have a FLT3
ITD or TKD mutation.
However, other mutations develop,
and the most commonly identified mutation
in those patients are mutations in RAS.