Create your Personal Health Record and unlock support built around you

  • Treatments and trials you qualify for
  • Education for your stage of care
  • Financial support for your medications
  • Solutions to your side effects
Video

Combination of Selinexor, Pomalidomide, & Dexamethasone for RRMM | Muhamed Baljevic, MD | #ASH24

Posted by
HealthTree Logo HealthTree
• December 23, 2024

Description

Muhamed Baljevic discusses a phase 1b/2 study on the SPd triplet combination (selinexor, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Transcript

My name is Mohamed Baly, which I'm Associate Professor of Medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, where I'm a director of multiple myeloma program in our amyloidosis multidisciplinary programs. This ash is very consequential. There's a lot of interesting and important information and abstract that have been presented in clinical trials that are given their updates. I'll spend just a couple of moments talking about two different abstracts that I had the pleasure of working with a couple of my colleagues. One of them is on the selenexor and pomalidomide indexomethazone triplet combination from a stomp phase 1b-2 study, which looked at patients with relapse refractory disease and gave this SPD triplet combination in several different fashions. Importantly, it gave it in a weekly fashion with 40 mg selenexor dose or 60 mg selenexor dose, but there was also a cohort which gave 40 or 60 twice a week. This is really important because selenexor is perhaps one of the drugs that suffered from a lot of anxiety and lack of experience with some of the more comfortable and tolerable weekly dosing schedules. This data is actually shedding light on the difference in terms of treatment adverse emergent events as well as efficacy once you actually change the dosing slightly. This abstract is essentially bringing to light is the fact that selenexor, pomalidomide and dexomethazone dosing at 40 mg versus 60 weekly achieved better results in terms of safety and efficacy. In terms of safety, there were lower treatment adverse events in terms of severity and frequency. There was also increase in the median treatment duration exposure as well as the intensity of selenexor dosing that was achieved with 40 versus 60 mg. Importantly, even though the numerically overall response rate was slightly higher in SPD60 cohort, what's relevant is that the medium PFS was actually not reached in the SPD40 versus 9.1 months in the SPD60. This goes back to that ability of staying on drugs, having less treatment emergent effects and patients overall better experience with this lower dosing. This is really important because SPD combination is an all oral combination of novel generation modulatory drug and the Xp1 inhibitor. It's a combination that can be potent. It's particularly useful and helpful in management of extra measure disease because it penetrates also the CNS space. So CNS myeloma can also be treated successfully with this combination of drugs. This has resulted in actually successful planning and ongoing study of SPD40 in a phase three randomized trial versus Illetuzumab, Pamalidomide and Daxamethasone in patients with triple class exposed previously treated multiple myeloma. So that phase three trial will result sometime soon and we'll see the results of that. So in summary, this is an important piece of data that showcases the lower dosing in terms of strength as well as frequency, which yields a better safety profile and it seems a better progression free survival as well.

Related Content